|
KMID : 1137020110220010018
|
|
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
2011 Volume.22 No. 1 p.18 ~ p.24
|
|
|
Differences in perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic management of benign and malignant adnexal masses
|
|
Gad Mohamad S.
Khouly Nabih I. El
Soto Enrique
Brodman Michael
Chuang Linus
Nezhat Farr R.
Gretz Herbert F.
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Objective: To compare the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic management of adnexal masses appearing preoperatively benign with those suspicious for malignancy.
Methods: Retrospective study of 694 women that underwent laparoscopic management of an adnexal mass.
Results: Laparoscopic management of an adnexal mass was completed in 678 patients. Six hundred and thirty five patients had benign pathology (91.5%) and 53 (7.6%) had primary ovarian cancers. Sixteen patients (2.3%) were converted to laparotomy; there were 13 intraoperative (1.9%) and 16 postoperative complications (2.3%). Patients divided in 2 groups: benign and borderline/malignant tumors. Patients in the benign group had a higher incidence of ovarian cyst rupture (26% vs. 8.7%, p<0.05). Patients in the borderline/malignant group had a statistically significant higher conversion rate to laparotomy (0.9% vs. 16.9%, p<0.001), postoperative complications (1.9% vs. 12.2%, p<0.05), blood loss, operative time, and duration of hospital stay. The incidence of intraoperative complications was similar between the 2 groups.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic management of masses that are suspicious for malignancy or borderline pathology is associated with an increased risk in specific intra―operative and post―operative morbidities in comparison to benign masses. Surgeons should tailor the operative risks with their patients according to the preoperative likelihood of the mass being carcinoma or borderline malignancy.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Laparoscopy, Benign, Malignant, Borderline, Adnexal mass
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
    
|